| dc.contributor.author | Kika, Jesal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kotze, Janeli | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-03T11:50:39Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-04-03T11:50:39Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-01 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Kika, J., Kotze, J. (2019). Unpacking grade repetition patterns in light of the progression policy in the Further Education and Training phase. Cape Town: SALDRU, UCT. (SALDRU Working Paper Number 243 Version 1/ NIDS Discussion Paper 2019/10) | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-928516-04-0 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://www.opensaldru.uct.ac.za/handle/11090/958 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Grade repetition is considered to be an important measure of education since it is both an outcome of a previous failure, and a predictor of subsequent failure (Anderson, Case, & Lam, 2001). Grade retention or the practice of requiring learners to repeat a grade, is used to afford underachieving learners with an opportunity to master the content of their current grade as well as acquire developmentally appropriate skills. It has, however, been a controversial issue in the sector, with some defending it as a beneficial remedial practice to improve academic performance, while others argue that it has detrimental effects (Peixoto, et al., 2016) | en_US |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Funding for this research from the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation is gratefully acknowledged. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Saldru Working Paper;243 | |
| dc.title | Unpacking grade repetition patterns in light of the progression policy in the Further Education and Training phase | en_US |
| dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |