Social cohesion and inequality in South Africa

SALDRU Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author David, Anda
dc.contributor.author Guilbert, Nathalie
dc.contributor.author Hino, Hiroyuki
dc.contributor.author Leibbrandt, Murray
dc.contributor.author Potgieter, Elnari
dc.contributor.author Shifa, Muna
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-12T12:53:43Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-12T12:53:43Z
dc.date.issued 2018-01
dc.identifier.citation David, A., Guilbert, N., Hino, H., Leibbrandt, M., Potgieter, E., Shifa, M. (2018). Social cohesion and inequality in South Africa. Cape Town: SALDRU, UCT. (SALDRU Working Paper Number 219).
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-928281-80-1
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11090/900
dc.description.abstract We examine recent trends in social cohesion and inequality, and the relationship between the two in South Africa using data from the South African Reconciliation Barometer Surveys. Given that the country’s history of long-term racial and socioeconomic segregation, we use the extent of inter-racial interactions as our main approximation of social cohesion. We show that although there is some improvement in the extent of inter-racial interactions over time, even today less than a third of South Africans often or always talk or socialize with someone from a different racial group. We use a multidimensional Living Standards Measure to assess the level of well-being and the level of inequality. Our inequality analysis of this measure indicates that since 2008 both vertical and horizontal (between races) inequality declined significantly. These trends can be attributed to progress made in the provision of basic services (i.e. water, electricity) and ownership of household assets in South Africa. In contrast, when we focus on subjective or perceived inequality, it is clear that large proportions of South Africans (about 70 percent) perceive that the extent of inequality (the gap between the poor and the rich) has not changed much or has even worsened over time. The key finding of our quantitative work is a significant relationship between individuals’ perception of inequality and their level of inter-racial interactions. Individuals who perceived that the gap between the rich and the poor is getting worse are less likely to participate in inter-racial socializations, while those who perceived that the gap is getting better are more likely to participate in inter-racial socializations. This finding remains strong and significant even after controlling for the influence of LSM, race, education, trust and other factors. Indeed, a number of these factors are also correlated with higher inter-racial interactions. Individuals who have higher education levels, a higher LSM and a better relative economic position are more likely to be involved in inter-racial socialization. In both the descriptive and multivariate analysis Africans and Whites are shown to have lower levels of inter-racial interactions than Coloureds at all LSM levels. The provincial-level multivariate analysis is able to examine the relationship between a full social cohesion index and inequality in LSMs. These results suggest that vertical inequality in living standards is correlated with the level of social cohesion. Higher inequality may adversely affect social cohesion as it reduces inclusiveness en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This paper is an AFD-UCT-IJR Partnership, written as part of the “Social Cohesion, Inequality and Inclusive Development” partnership agreement between the French Development Agency, South African Office and the University of Cape Town. It is funded by the French Development Agency (AFD). We acknowledge very useful comments from AFD seminars in Pretoria and in Paris as well as from participants in the 4th DIAL Conference on Development Economics. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Saldru Working Papers;219
dc.subject Social cohesion en_US
dc.subject Inequality en_US
dc.subject South Africa en_US
dc.subject Inter-racial interactions en_US
dc.title Social cohesion and inequality in South Africa en_US
dc.type Working Paper en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search OpenSALDRU


Browse

My Account

Statistics